<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parallels Desktop or Fusion?  Which one should you use?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidtse916.wordpress.com/2007/12/29/parallels-desktop-or-fusion-which-one-should-you-use/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidtse916.wordpress.com/2007/12/29/parallels-desktop-or-fusion-which-one-should-you-use/</link>
	<description>If you live each day as if it was your last, someday you'll most certainly be right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:48:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hooman</title>
		<link>http://davidtse916.wordpress.com/2007/12/29/parallels-desktop-or-fusion-which-one-should-you-use/#comment-1348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hooman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidtse916.wordpress.com/2007/12/29/parallels-desktop-or-fusion-which-one-should-you-use/#comment-1348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If someone has a Mac Pro, they are better off with Fusion in either case. Because Fusion supports multiple VM CPUs but the current version (3.0) of Paralles only supports one virtual CPU. 

If you use ready made VMWare VMs (called virtual appliances), you might want to adjust their settings especially the number of CPUs and allocated memory before running them.

Another place where Fusion excels is running Linux. It provides much better integration tools (and probably better stability) than Parallels.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If someone has a Mac Pro, they are better off with Fusion in either case. Because Fusion supports multiple VM CPUs but the current version (3.0) of Paralles only supports one virtual CPU. </p>
<p>If you use ready made VMWare VMs (called virtual appliances), you might want to adjust their settings especially the number of CPUs and allocated memory before running them.</p>
<p>Another place where Fusion excels is running Linux. It provides much better integration tools (and probably better stability) than Parallels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
